Conditioning people to costly car servicing

IT MUST be difficult to be in the car business these days. The latest Morgan poll out this week shows a 10 per cent fall in intention to buy a new car in the next year. And the first mass-produced fully electric car was launched on to the Australian market.

So people in the business will use every endeavour to keep as much of it as possible. The European manufacturers, particularly the Germans, have found quite a clever way to keep the service business after sales.

For a long time manufacturers attempted to keep this business by suggesting that warranties would be voided unless servicing was done by the authorised dealer using genuine parts.

They also advertised suggesting that only the authorised dealer could do a totally satisfactory job.

Many consumers dutifully take their cars to the authorised dealer for servicing, either from apathy or from fear that independent operators – like K-Mart and others – are dodgy, or untrained, or don’t have the right equipment or use inferior parts.

Independent operators had a victory in 2002 when the ACCC said manufacturers could not insist the authorised dealer did the service using only the manufacturer’s parts. They could only insist that the service be done by qualified people using parts that are fit for the purpose.

The “genuine” or manufacturers’ parts and the authorised dealer’s labour are invariably much more expensive than generic parts and independent labour – eye-wateringly so.

Since 2002, the way has been open for independent operators to get into the business of servicing relatively new cars. They have had to overcome a fair amount of prejudice. Often in the market, the best way to overcome prejudice is by word of mouth. So when someone you know tells you about a cheaper but equally good service, prejudice falls away.

Until about five years ago there was no way I would take my Subaru to K-mart. K-Mart, as far I was concerned, sold cheap inferior goods, until I was told otherwise by a satisfied customer.

They have been servicing my Subaru for five years quite satisfactorily for, on my estimate, less than half the cost of the authorised dealer. But that is only the experience of one person. Similarly for my wife’s Audi.

Then she bought a new BMW. Magnificent car, especially on fuel efficiency.

Now, the German and other European Governments, unlike profligate, laissez-faire Anglo-Saxons, have introduced ever more strict environmental rules – especially on fuel efficiency and emissions.

In response, the manufacturers, have tried to reduce the number of services (especially oil changes). BMW has an extraordinarily engineered computer system that monitors oil quality by constantly measuring hot and cold starts, speed, distance and so on. It’s a bit like my on-the-wrist scuba diving computer which does thousands of calculations of air intake and at what depth to tell me how long I can stay at my present depth without risk.

The BMW computer monitors everything else as well, and when you need an oil, brake-fluid or air-filter change it flashes a SERVICE warning light on the dash. You only service when you have to. It is called condition-based servicing.

Sounds good, but there is a catch. It does not flash “Engine Oil Change” or “Brake Fluid Change” – just “SERVICE”. To find out exactly what is needed you have to put the big black ignition key into a special BMW-created reader attached to a computer.

And the only way to remove the service-warning light is with BMW-created software. Eat your heart out, Bill Gates.

When the BMW service light went on I rang and asked for a back-of-the-envelope estimate for a first service and was told up to $1300. (Sounds of jaws dropping and gulps of breath.)

The K-mart people said they could do all of the work, but only on a standard schedule. It did not have the special BMW key reader and it could not turn out the SERVICE light.

I then thought I should put on my journalist’s hat and put inquiries into the Motor Trades Association, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and some other independent operators and go back to BMW.

The MTAA said BMW was not denying independent operators access to information or equipment.

“It is available to K Mart should they choose to make the investment,” the executive Director of MTAA of the ACT said.

Given that it was unreasonable to do a price comparison. All authorised dealership franchises had to have the equipment.

BMW did the key scan and I got a printout of the work needed. The quote came to $820.55. K-Mart quoted under $300, but could not turn out the light. After some searching here and interstate I found an independent operator who had the equipment to turn out the service light. He quoted between $300 and $450 for the work. All use the top synthetic oil.

The real question is whether BMW or other manufacturers charge so highly for their condition-based-servicing equipment that it in effect precludes all or all but a few independent operators access. MTAA said the cost was “multiple thousands of dollars”. A further question is whether it gives independents access at the same price as its own franchise dealerships. And further whether there are any trade-practices implications.

It may well be that the manufacturers charge reasonable prices for their equipment and that K-Mart won’t stump up the price because its market is for older cars.

Alas, the ACCC have not responded to my queries.

Incidentally, some of the mechanics I spoke to point out that condition-based servicing may not be all it is cracked up to be. They say you should change the oil every 10,000kms anyway. Stretching it out is false economy if you want the car to last, but the manufacturers are only interested in it lasting the warranty period and you buying another one shortly thereafter.

Further, they say, condition-based serving has another downside: you don’t want to be running in to service the car every time one item is due. You would want to collect items and do them together at one time. In other words, according to a service schedule.

Ah, but then you would not need special equipment to turn out the service light. Of course, you could always buy an electric car.
CRISPIN HULL
This article first appeared in The Canberra Times on 5 June 2010.

3 thoughts on “Conditioning people to costly car servicing”

  1. James,

    Since you represent the manufacturers, can you please explain to us common folk why the parts commonly used in services – filters, plugs and so on – costs significantly more (in some cases, multiple times the cost) at the dealers than identical items found at the local spares shop? Surely a massive international company like Toyota can source the parts at a fraction of the price that the ordinary consumer can obtain it for?

    And, while your at it, can you also indicate whether the cost associated with obtaining “the tools, diagnostic equipment and training from the manufacturer ” is same for dealers as independent operators? I suspect not.

    One last point: Your comment about genuine parts is incorrect. As noted in the article parts simply have to be fit for purpose. It’s also hypocritical to suggest that genuine parts are (generally) better than other off-the-shelf parts since (a) in most cases these parts ARE the same as commonly available ones, bar the branding and (b) most well-known parts are manufactured to meet and exceed specifications.

  2. I read your article on Saturday with interest.  Just a couple of quick points to firstly, introduce myself and the organisation if you ever need anything further and secondly to clarify a few issues.  More information on our website: http://www.fcai.com.au/safety/vehicle-servicing-and-repairs

    The FCAI represents the manufacturers, not the dealers.  It is important to remember that dealers are all independent businesses just like any other repairer in Canberra.  The dealer principal has a franchise agreement with a manufacturer, just the same as the owner of a K-Mart auto franchise has with K-Mart.  

    In that agreement, dealers must pay the manufacturer for the right to access the correct servicing information.  Dealers do not get the tools, diagnostic equipment and training from the manufacturer for free.    Any repairer – ABC autos, Joe Bloggs Autos, K-Mart Auto etc – also has the right to buy this information and equipment from the manufacturer.  Most choose not to.  The manufacturer accredited repairer is therefore specialised in that particular make of vehicle – others need to “make do” with what they know of vehicles in-general.

    In regards to warranty issues – my simplest explanation is this.  You can take your vehicle wherever you like to be serviced but it all comes down to the detail.  For example, a “service” as a small garage in Belconnen could cost $100 and involve changing the oil and spark plugs.  This however is NOT a manufacturer’s “log book” service and therefore is unlikely to meet warranty conditions if a problem arises.  If the place at Belconnen was to offer a “log book” service and fulfill everything that the manufacturer lists in the log book, including genuine parts, then that is fine.  

    Many manufacturers offer long warranties – eg Mitsubishi offers 10 years and indeed also offers fixed price servicing (so too does Toyota) – so it is up to customers what they are prepared to pay for but the choice is indeed theirs.

  3. An excellent article Crispin.
    Some late model Mercedes Benz do not even have an engine oil dipstick!
    They keep it at the dealership.

    It is definitely not a level playing field in our industry and the
    consumer is sometimes the loser. You would of course be aware that
    K-mart is also a franchise or some variation of that model and that our
    industry in Canberra is moving towards the franchise model. But without
    any undue publicity that this is so. The big Canadian/American franchise
    Midas is also operating here now. It is getting harder and harder for us
    smaller independents to survive.

    I have been operating here for thirty years and like you I look forward
    to the coming of the electric car. That is going to be truly
    revolutionary and I will be very, very happy to finally hang my spanners
    up. Vested interests are going to have to go to ever increasing
    desperate moves to wring the last drops of blood out of the consumer. It
    is particularly interesting that “amateurs” like the Blade family in
    Victoria are able to make a commercial go of the electric car.

    Thanks again for an excellent article and I agree with the mechanics you
    spoke to at the end of your article.
    Nat McGahey for cwc auto services.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *